<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KICAD Free and Open Source EDA Tool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/</link>
	<description>Microcontrollers Electronics Hobby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bino balqs</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>bino balqs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-944</guid>
		<description>i want to try this software for my pcb design.
thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to try this software for my pcb design.<br />
thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embedds</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Embedds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 07:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-943</guid>
		<description>If such software would be shifted to community developed CAD platform it could be a great free alternative to eagle cad and other choices among hobbyists. The idea of Kicad really looks promising - I should give a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If such software would be shifted to community developed CAD platform it could be a great free alternative to eagle cad and other choices among hobbyists. The idea of Kicad really looks promising &#8211; I should give a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Update: Grab the windowsxp self installer version, if you have vista, no more problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: Grab the windowsxp self installer version, if you have vista, no more problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-941</guid>
		<description>What is the version for VISTA?  I hate when they don&#039;t tell you which to download.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the version for VISTA?  I hate when they don&#8217;t tell you which to download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: follower</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>follower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-940</guid>
		<description>@Jaime:

Unfortunately the link to the binaries on that page is to a site whose owner removed the binaries... :-(

Assuming you meant http://lothar.dnsalias.net/wordpress/?page_id=30 for the second site, I do recall seeing that information before--from memory it was either included into the source, or some dicussion around it faded out... I could be wrong on that tho.

--Phil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jaime:</p>
<p>Unfortunately the link to the binaries on that page is to a site whose owner removed the binaries&#8230; <img src='http://www.uchobby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Assuming you meant <a href="http://lothar.dnsalias.net/wordpress/?page_id=30" rel="nofollow">http://lothar.dnsalias.net/wordpress/?page_id=30</a> for the second site, I do recall seeing that information before&#8211;from memory it was either included into the source, or some dicussion around it faded out&#8230; I could be wrong on that tho.</p>
<p>&#8211;Phil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime Silva</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-939</guid>
		<description>I think this link could be of interest, there is a link to a OSX version, how to build it, tutorials, etc.

http://www.kicadlib.org/Kicad_related_links.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this link could be of interest, there is a link to a OSX version, how to build it, tutorials, etc.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kicadlib.org/Kicad_related_links.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kicadlib.org/Kicad_related_links.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Coates</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Coates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-938</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very interested in getting an OSX version, too...

Please keep us updated (-:

S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very interested in getting an OSX version, too&#8230;</p>
<p>Please keep us updated (-:</p>
<p>S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: follower</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>follower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-937</guid>
		<description>Yeah, unfortunately the guy took down his binaries and my laptop with them on is in need of serious repairs so I can&#039;t access them. Ditto the build I made... :-(

If you follow some of the details in http://code.rancidbacon.com/BuildingKiCadOnMacOSX you might be able to rebuild it yourself.

Unfortunately as I note on the page, the version I built seemed to have more issues than the older version built by the other guy.

The biggest issue was with the cursor/marquee lines not being erased properly. This would probably make using it on OS X a pretty miserable experience.

If/when I get my PowerBook fixed I&#039;ll probably try again.

--Phil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, unfortunately the guy took down his binaries and my laptop with them on is in need of serious repairs so I can&#8217;t access them. Ditto the build I made&#8230; <img src='http://www.uchobby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If you follow some of the details in <a href="http://code.rancidbacon.com/BuildingKiCadOnMacOSX" rel="nofollow">http://code.rancidbacon.com/BuildingKiCadOnMacOSX</a> you might be able to rebuild it yourself.</p>
<p>Unfortunately as I note on the page, the version I built seemed to have more issues than the older version built by the other guy.</p>
<p>The biggest issue was with the cursor/marquee lines not being erased properly. This would probably make using it on OS X a pretty miserable experience.</p>
<p>If/when I get my PowerBook fixed I&#8217;ll probably try again.</p>
<p>&#8211;Phil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dfowler</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>dfowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-936</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

Looks like its an unoffical build. I found it at the Rancid Bacon site below. I have a Mac Book Pro so please let me know if you get this working. Perhaps Follower will give us some insight.

http://code.rancidbacon.com/LearningAboutKiCad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>Looks like its an unoffical build. I found it at the Rancid Bacon site below. I have a Mac Book Pro so please let me know if you get this working. Perhaps Follower will give us some insight.</p>
<p><a href="http://code.rancidbacon.com/LearningAboutKiCad" rel="nofollow">http://code.rancidbacon.com/LearningAboutKiCad</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinski</title>
		<link>http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uchobby.com/index.php/2008/01/15/kicad-free-and-open-source-eda-tool/#comment-935</guid>
		<description>I use and much prefer Eagle, also I will admit it sucks being restricted to 100mmm by 160mmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use and much prefer Eagle, also I will admit it sucks being restricted to 100mmm by 160mmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

